New Delhi: National Capital Delhi Cockrose Janata Party in (C.J.P.The Supreme Court of the country on Saturday in the matter of keeping metro stations closed due to security reasons in view of the proposed protest.Supreme Court) A contempt petition has been filed. petitioner Shailendra Mani Tripathi has alleged in its petition that the administrative authorities concerned have not followed the clear instructions of the Supreme Court dated October 9. Union Home Secretary in this petition Govind Mohan Including other key officials have been made parties. The petitioner has demanded that strict contempt proceedings be initiated against the responsible officers for allegedly disobeying the court’s orders.
Supreme Court’s prior instructions: Passengers should not face unnecessary trouble
Before this, Supreme Court had given clear instructions during the hearing on Friday that in view of the demonstration to be held on October 10 Delhi The movement of incoming metro and Indian Railways trains should not be completely stopped. Chief Justice suryakantJustice Joymalya Bagchi and justice v mohana The bench had said that although the security agencies are free to take necessary steps at their level to maintain law and order, common citizens should not be unnecessarily and unnecessarily harassed due to this.
The top court had also underlined that there is a difference between imposing a complete ban on metro and rail services and regulating their operations. According to the bench, consideration should be given to continuing the smooth operation of these transport services by ensuring adequate security arrangements. The apex court had also directed that any changes or decisions related to operations should be given wide publicity, so that passengers do not face any inconvenience during the journey.
Petitioners’ allegations and restrictions on metro stations
The main allegation made in the petition filed is that despite the clear instructions of the Supreme Court, many important metro stations in the national capital were kept completely closed. The petitioner argues that due to these restrictions and restrictions, normal life was severely affected and common citizens faced a lot of difficulties in reaching their destination. In the petition, citing disobedience of the court order, the demand for initiating contempt proceedings against the officers has been reiterated. However, in the original legal developments, there has been no immediate confirmation of any new judicial action or order from the Supreme Court on this petition.
Against whom is this demonstration of CJP?
This whole controversy is related to Cockrose Janata Party (C.J.P.) by the Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar Has stood up regarding the protests called against. In view of this proposed demonstration, from the point of view of law and order and security Delhi 45 metro stations were kept closed as a precautionary measure from 9 pm on Friday to 6 pm on Saturday. Even in the official advisory issued by the Metro administration, the main reason for keeping the station closed was security arrangements.
Apart from this, the Supreme Court in its earlier order had also said that to maintain smooth and uninterrupted movement of road traffic within the city, traffic advisories should be issued from time to time, and for this, print media, newspapers and online digital mediums should be used extensively so that the common people do not have to face any kind of unexpected problem while traveling.
